CO129-162 - Sir Kennedy - 1873 [1-3] — Page 233

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

Act, 1800, and Ordinance, No. 8 of 1871.

18. Mr. Smale has, further, reiterated the views which were expressed in the Memorial of 27th June, 1867, wherein the entire prohibition of Chinese Emigration is advocated. I do not concur in those views, but in the face of the able and conclusive letter which my Predecessor, Sir Richard Graves MacDonnell, caused to be sent to Messrs. Smale and Whillier, and of the Duke of Buckingham's remark Vide Para. 13, that the Governor had sufficiently answered the arguments of the Memorialists, I do not consider it necessary to trouble His Lordship with any additional observations on the point which has been thus treated by Her Majesty's Government.

14. I presume it will be considered as settled that Chinese Emigration, under certain provisions, is not to be prohibited, and should it be decided that legislation is to be introduced, it is of importance (and I do not underrate the importance and the difficulty) to decide as to what provisions may be required. I must very firmly and distinctly dissent from the opinion that such

Edit History

2026-05-21 01:08:20 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
Act, 1800, and Ordinance, No. 8 of 1871. 18. Mr. Smale has, further, reiterated the views which were expressed in the Memorial of 27th June, 1867, wherein the entire prohibition of Chinese Emigration is advocated. I do not concur in those views, but in the face of the able and conclusive letter which my Predecessor, Sir Richard Graves MacDonnell, caused to be sent to Messrs. Smale and Whillier, and of the Duke of Buckingham's remark Vide Para. 13, that the Governor had sufficiently answered the arguments of the Memorialists, I do not consider it necessary to trouble His Lordship with any additional observations on the point which has been thus treated by Her Majesty's Government. 14. I presume it will be considered as settled that Chinese Emigration, under certain provisions, is not to be prohibited, and should it be decided that legislation is to be introduced, it is of importance (and I do not underrate the importance and the difficulty) to decide as to what provisions may be required. I must very firmly and distinctly dissent from the opinion that such
Baseline (Original)
8. Act, 1800, and of Ordinance, No. 8 the thongting 8 of 1871. J 18. Mr. Smale has, further, reiterated the views which were expressed in the Manorial of 27th jime, 1867, wherein the entire prohibition of Chin Elvine Emigration is advocated. I do not concur in those views, but face of stie ablo and condusive letter which my Redecessor, Iir Richard Graves Mac Damell, caused to be sent to Mesto. Imale and Whillall), and of Dep. Ne "93 Sept!" 1869. the Duke of Buckingham's of Buckingham's remark Vid. &.0. that the Gaumer had sufficiently anoward the arguments of the Memorialists, I do not consider it Vide Porra 13. 106229 necesary to trouble (Jan Sordship with amy additional observations the point which has beer itus treated by the Majesty's Government. 14. ال iman, I presume, be considered as settled that Chinese Enigration, under certain provisions, is not to be prohibited, and shims it is of importance (and I do not underrate the importance and the difficully, to decide as legislation is to be introduced. Very probablyp 15. by the Chief Justices may as to what ww as submitted Imperial be required, bist I munt Ad very very firmily distinctly and difsent from the opinion that such
2026-05-21 01:08:20 · Baseline
View content

8.

Act, 1800, and

of

Ordinance, No. 8

the thongting 8 of 1871.

J

18.

Mr. Smale has, further,

reiterated the views which were

expressed in the Manorial of 27th jime, 1867, wherein the entire prohibition of Chin

Elvine Emigration

is advocated. I do not concur in

those views,

but

face of stie

ablo and condusive letter which

my Redecessor, Iir Richard Graves Mac Damell, caused to be sent to Mesto. Imale and Whillall), and of

Dep. Ne

"93 Sept!"

1869.

the Duke of Buckingham's

of Buckingham's remark Vid. &.0. that the Gaumer had sufficiently anoward the arguments of the

Memorialists, I do not consider it

• Vide Porra 13.

106229

necesary to trouble (Jan Sordship

with

amy

additional observations

the point which has beer itus treated by the Majesty's Government.

14.

ال

iman,

I presume, be considered as settled that Chinese

Enigration, under certain provisions,

is not to be prohibited, and shims it is of importance (and I do not underrate the importance and the difficully, to decide as legislation is to be introduced. Very probablyp

15.

by the Chief Justices

may

as to what

ww

as submitted

Imperial

be required, bist I munt

Ad

very

very firmily

distinctly and

difsent from the opinion that such

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.